06 February 2011

Mongolia here for Azkals match

By Olmin Leyba (The Philippine Star) Updated February 07, 2011 12:00 AM MANILA

Mongolia is due to arrive today in Bacolod City, probably the first time the Philippine Azkals can sort of size up the opponent they hardly saw or knew.

“I myself don’t have an idea about them (Mongolia), except that we’re ranked higher than them and that they lost to Guam previously,” said veteran forward Ian Araneta in a radio interview yesterday.

The Mongolians have apparently been inactive, their last international tournament being the AFC Challenge Cup qualifier against Macau back in 2009. Ranked 182nd against the Philippines’ 152nd, the visiting booters also had the shameful reputation of losing to Guam, one of the world’s weakest football nations, 0-1, in 2009.

Other than this, the Azkals hope they also could get scouting reports from the Mongolians’ stint in Guangzhou, China, where they trained in and played four matches in preparation for the opener of their AFC Challenge Cup tie with the hosts.

But one thing going for the Azkals, team manager Dan Palami offered, is the likelihood that the Mongolians might not have sufficient training for Wednesday’s match set at the Panaad Stadium.

“It’s too cold in Mongolia and they could not really practice as well as they wanted to. It was only in Guangzhou where they were able to practice properly,” Palami said.

In contrast, he said the Azkals had a good training program under new coach Michael Weiss, not to mention having more firepower than the crew that reached the semis of last year’s AFF Suzuki Cup.

“I’m quite confident we’ll have a good result in our home game (against Mongolia),” Palami said.

3 comments:

  1. I hope they could add Chad Gould and Schrock on the Challenge Cup Group Stage.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I found some latest pics of the Azkals practice in Bacolod in the Ilonggo United FC facebook. The newcomers (Fil-Fors) are there, too.

    ReplyDelete
  3. If Mongolia lost to Guam, the Azkals should destroy them. 8-0, at least.

    ReplyDelete