06 October 2013

Rufo Sanchez : One year ban from UFL !

UFL have given Rufo Sanchez (Global Fc) ONE year ban from UFL !


Stallion and Global Fc have been informed by UFL.

No official announcement from UFL yet.

Global Fc is expected to appeal this decision.
Lagt inn av kl.

15 comments:

  1. Anonymous6 October 2013 at 13:56

    Damn, thats harsh. What about the clubs? Anyway, he can always go back to play in Spain and play in a much better league, rather than crappy UFL.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous6 October 2013 at 14:52

    What about sanctions on the clubs, specifically to Global FC? The punishment can't just be to the player.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10 October 2013 at 08:47

      Why stop with the club? Don't you think the UFL should be ban also for failure to oversee contractual issues? I mean how in the world was Ruffo signed in the first place by Global if his contract is not termed yet? I would think the UFL have some kind of oversight in the contract to monitor who's contract is up or not or whether the transactions are permited all that sorts? IDK. lol. I understand it's a young league but come on contracts are legal bindings.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous17 December 2013 at 22:40

      lol! talo po ang stallion at UFL dito. in the end, magbabayad ng damages ang stallion at ufl sa global. plus me law suit pa against ufl.

      Delete
  3. Anonymous6 October 2013 at 15:07

    Global should be punished as well, but do you really think that they wanna punish Palami? I think not.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous6 October 2013 at 15:32

    The punishment must be on the clubs not on the player.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous6 October 2013 at 15:43

      Both! More so because Rufo is an expatriate, meaning he should have an actual written contract and therefore should know which club he's tied to and when his stay expires.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous8 October 2013 at 05:18

      Ang daming conclusions, scientist!

      Delete
    3. Anonymous8 October 2013 at 12:49

      @ Anonymous 8 October 2013 05:18

      Ah salamat!! Bilang isang scientist, na conclude ko rin na ikaw ay isang BOPLOKZ!!! Now STFU you troll!!

      Delete
  5. Anonymous6 October 2013 at 16:05

    Problem started because patlami is giving power to control football in the country.
    Patlami should be told to choose to decide to be either owner of global or member of pff.
    He cannot be both at the same time as it allows him to abuse the power.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous7 October 2013 at 03:22

      your stupid comment is as stupid as your logic. i don't even know if you know football!

      Delete
    2. Anonymous7 October 2013 at 16:21

      Really??
      We dun see any bpl owners in english fa comittee?
      Wat is so special abour palami? ?

      Delete
    3. Anonymous7 October 2013 at 16:30

      ^^True!! Not only that though, but Palami is also president of the Leyte FA president and team manager of the NT which it makes it even more of a farce!!

      Delete
  6. Anonymous7 October 2013 at 03:24

    daming keyboard warriors! hahaha johnny knows no nothing.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous8 October 2013 at 05:13

      ikaw na ang may maraming alam!

      Delete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)