Why stop with the club? Don't you think the UFL should be ban also for failure to oversee contractual issues? I mean how in the world was Ruffo signed in the first place by Global if his contract is not termed yet? I would think the UFL have some kind of oversight in the contract to monitor who's contract is up or not or whether the transactions are permited all that sorts? IDK. lol. I understand it's a young league but come on contracts are legal bindings.
Both! More so because Rufo is an expatriate, meaning he should have an actual written contract and therefore should know which club he's tied to and when his stay expires.
Problem started because patlami is giving power to control football in the country. Patlami should be told to choose to decide to be either owner of global or member of pff. He cannot be both at the same time as it allows him to abuse the power.
^^True!! Not only that though, but Palami is also president of the Leyte FA president and team manager of the NT which it makes it even more of a farce!!
Damn, thats harsh. What about the clubs? Anyway, he can always go back to play in Spain and play in a much better league, rather than crappy UFL.
ReplyDeleteWhat about sanctions on the clubs, specifically to Global FC? The punishment can't just be to the player.
ReplyDeleteWhy stop with the club? Don't you think the UFL should be ban also for failure to oversee contractual issues? I mean how in the world was Ruffo signed in the first place by Global if his contract is not termed yet? I would think the UFL have some kind of oversight in the contract to monitor who's contract is up or not or whether the transactions are permited all that sorts? IDK. lol. I understand it's a young league but come on contracts are legal bindings.
Deletelol! talo po ang stallion at UFL dito. in the end, magbabayad ng damages ang stallion at ufl sa global. plus me law suit pa against ufl.
DeleteGlobal should be punished as well, but do you really think that they wanna punish Palami? I think not.
ReplyDeleteThe punishment must be on the clubs not on the player.
ReplyDeleteBoth! More so because Rufo is an expatriate, meaning he should have an actual written contract and therefore should know which club he's tied to and when his stay expires.
DeleteAng daming conclusions, scientist!
Delete@ Anonymous 8 October 2013 05:18
DeleteAh salamat!! Bilang isang scientist, na conclude ko rin na ikaw ay isang BOPLOKZ!!! Now STFU you troll!!
Problem started because patlami is giving power to control football in the country.
ReplyDeletePatlami should be told to choose to decide to be either owner of global or member of pff.
He cannot be both at the same time as it allows him to abuse the power.
your stupid comment is as stupid as your logic. i don't even know if you know football!
DeleteReally??
DeleteWe dun see any bpl owners in english fa comittee?
Wat is so special abour palami? ?
^^True!! Not only that though, but Palami is also president of the Leyte FA president and team manager of the NT which it makes it even more of a farce!!
Deletedaming keyboard warriors! hahaha johnny knows no nothing.
ReplyDeleteikaw na ang may maraming alam!
Delete